2 ms·
Apart from pedestrians.
by noosphr 6mo ago
Apart from pedestrians.
- phyzix5761 6mo agoIt never made sense to me why cars and pedestrians need to share the same spaces. Why can't we have more efficient walking routes that are away from cars?
- noosphr 6mo agoBecause cars took over the streets from pedestrians between 1900 and 1930 and no one noticed. Hopefully when petrol hits $10 a gallon in the next few months more of the world will think about banning cars from high density areas.
- phyzix5761 6mo agoIts already over $12 per gallon in Singapore. Let's see what happens.
- rtpg 6mo agoif you have roads shared with pedestrians and cars (and bikes!) you can build denser cities. I lived real downtown in Tokyo and my street was like "1.5" lanes wide (if cars were coming in both directions one basically needs to pull over and stop). I could just walk in the middle of the street. There was no sidewalk. No street parking of course. Cars would drive down at 15km/h or whatever, and slow to a crawl if people were in the street. Straight lines are efficient walking routes, and ... well... that might involve just crossing the street directly! Every layer of grade separation gets in the way of that. End result of all of this is less pavement to maintain, slower drivers (-> safer!), good walking and cycling conditions, etc etc etc.
- oblio 6mo agoYes, we can do that by banning leisure cars trips from all dense areas. What's that you say? Drivers are a major and rich political force and they will block such decisions?