2 ms·
"Built this after realizing I was spending ~$1400/week on Claude Code with almost no visibility into what was actually consuming tokens." holy slop. the $200/m
by ieie3366 6mo ago
"Built this after realizing I was spending ~$1400/week on Claude Code with almost no visibility into what was actually consuming tokens."
holy slop. the $200/month plan has NEVER hit rate limits for me and I often run 5+ tabs of concurrent agents in a large 300k LoC codebase
- agentseal 6mo agonot $1,400 out of pocket, thats the API equivalent cost of the tokens. I am on the $200/month Max plan :D. In my case I mostly consume every bit of the weekly subscription.
- ethan_smith 6mo agoThe $200/month plan throttles you when you hit limits - you just wait in a queue. API usage at $1400/week means unthrottled, parallel execution with no waiting. These are very different use cases, and for teams or heavy automation workflows the API cost can make sense if the time savings justify it.
- weird-eye-issue 6mo agoThat's not how it works You've never actually hit the limit have you? If you have you would know it's a hard limit.
- cududa 6mo agoYou’ve never used the API version versus the $200 plan and set the two at the exact same task, have you?
- weird-eye-issue 6mo agoI used the API version for quite a while before using a subscription, which I now have used extensively for many months. So, is your claim that they just slow down and queue the subscription version, or are you accusing them of using nerfed models, or is it something else? The only time I ever get some slowness has to do with the models being overloaded and has nothing to do with limits. Those are two separate concepts you seem to be confusing. And luckily, this is pretty rare for me since I don't work during US time zones.