3 ms·
Idk but ironically, I had to re-read the first part of GP's comment three times, wondering WTF they're implying a mistake, before I noticed it's the car wash, n
by TeMPOraL 7mo ago
Idk but ironically, I had to re-read the first part of GP's comment three times, wondering WTF they're implying a mistake, before I noticed it's the car wash, not the car, that's 50 meters away.
I'd say it's a very human mistake to make.
- thfuran 7mo agoI don't want my computer to make human mistakes.
- scrollaway 7mo agothen don't train it on human data
- AgentOrange1234 7mo agoIt may be inescapable for problems where we need to interpret human language?
- jasonfarnon 7mo agothen throw away the turing test
- magicalist 7mo ago> I'd say it's a very human mistake to make. >> It'll take you under a minute, and driving 50 meters barely gets the engine warm — plus you'd just have to park again at the other end. Honestly, by the time you started the car, you'd already be there on foot. It talks about starting, driving, and parking the car, clearly reasoning about traveling that distance in the car not to the car. It did not make the same mistake you did.
- toraway 7mo agoWe truly do not need to lower the bar to the floor whenever an LLM makes an embarrassing logical error, particularly when the excuses don't line up at all with the reasoning in its explanation.
- 59nadir 7mo agoLLMs do not have trouble reading, it didn't make the mistake you made and it wouldn't. You missed a word, LLMs cannot miss words. It's not even remotely a human mistake.