2 ms·

Claude Opus 4.7

186 points by AlphaWeaver 6mo ago

AlphaWeaver 6mo ago
Might be better to update the URL to this, actually: https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-4-7 https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-4-7
constantius 6mo ago
Not related to this release, but is anyone aware of what's happening with Deepseek? The usual cascade of synced releases has been lacking this frontier lab whale for a while now.
- rvz 6mo ago
  > Not related to this release, but is anyone aware of what's happening with Deepseek? Given that no-one is talking about DeepSeek, I assume it is coming this month. They are still releasing research papers and that is what really matters and not the .1 increment releases of AI models to massage benchmarks or create hype around.
  - cmrdporcupine 6mo ago
    There's been months of "DeepSeek v4 next week!" rumours and none have panned out. They're either stuck/dead or they're sitting on something really fantastic that they only want to release once they've perfected it. My realistic side thinks the former, my optimism on the latter. In the meantime, GLM 5.1 is actually really good.
    - bsaul 6mo ago
      i tried to find an API pricing for GLM 5.1 but couldn't find any on the homepage. How are you using it ?
      - cmrdporcupine 6mo ago
        per-token via DeepInfra, who hosts it as one of their models. https://deepinfra.com/zai-org/GLM-5.1 https://deepinfra.com/zai-org/GLM-5.1
    - constantius 5mo ago
      You were right to be optimistic.
hansmayer 6mo ago
Ah, here we go again.
ChrisArchitect 6mo ago
Some more discussion on announcement post: https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-4-7 https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-4-7 (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47793411 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47793411)
- tomhow 6mo ago
  Comments moved thither. Thanks!
grandinquistor 6mo ago
Quite a big improvement in coding benchmarks, doesn’t seem like progress is plateauing as some people predicted.
jameson 6mo ago
How should one compare benchmark results? For example, SWE-bench Pro improved ~11% compared with Opus 4.6. Should one interpret it as 4.7 is able to solve more difficult problems? or 11% less hallucinations?
vomayank 6mo ago
[flagged]
pukaworks 6mo ago
[dead]

186 points by AlphaWeaver 6mo ago

Might be better to update the URL to this, actually: https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-4-7 https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-4-7

constantius 6mo ago

Not related to this release, but is anyone aware of what's happening with Deepseek? The usual cascade of synced releases has been lacking this frontier lab whale for a while now.

rvz 6mo ago
> Not related to this release, but is anyone aware of what's happening with Deepseek? Given that no-one is talking about DeepSeek, I assume it is coming this month. They are still releasing research papers and that is what really matters and not the .1 increment releases of AI models to massage benchmarks or create hype around.
- cmrdporcupine 6mo ago
  There's been months of "DeepSeek v4 next week!" rumours and none have panned out. They're either stuck/dead or they're sitting on something really fantastic that they only want to release once they've perfected it. My realistic side thinks the former, my optimism on the latter. In the meantime, GLM 5.1 is actually really good.
  - bsaul 6mo ago
    i tried to find an API pricing for GLM 5.1 but couldn't find any on the homepage. How are you using it ?
    - cmrdporcupine 6mo ago
      per-token via DeepInfra, who hosts it as one of their models. https://deepinfra.com/zai-org/GLM-5.1 https://deepinfra.com/zai-org/GLM-5.1
  - constantius 5mo ago
    You were right to be optimistic.

hansmayer 6mo ago

Ah, here we go again.

ChrisArchitect 6mo ago

Some more discussion on announcement post: https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-4-7 https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-4-7 (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47793411 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47793411)

tomhow 6mo ago
Comments moved thither. Thanks!

grandinquistor 6mo ago

Quite a big improvement in coding benchmarks, doesn’t seem like progress is plateauing as some people predicted.

jameson 6mo ago

How should one compare benchmark results? For example, SWE-bench Pro improved ~11% compared with Opus 4.6. Should one interpret it as 4.7 is able to solve more difficult problems? or 11% less hallucinations?

vomayank 6mo ago

[flagged]

pukaworks 6mo ago

[dead]