3 ms·

Notable exception: the TikTok ban.

by nothrabannosir 6mo ago

unselect5917 6mo ago
[flagged]
- nobody9999 6mo ago
  >Now if you search for the USS Liberty, you get no results and instead a hardcoded link to a 'holocaust museum' website as the only result. That's a lie. A search[0] shows these as the first three results: USS Liberty incident - Wikipedia [1] USS Liberty incident | Facts, Deaths, & Investigation | Britannica [2] 'We're Fed Up With It': Survivors of the USS Liberty Look for Answers [3] In fact, the entire first page (and much of the second) of search results are specifically about the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty. There are no links to the Holocaust Museum anywhere to be found. Did you make up that lie yourself, or are you just blindly parroting what others tell you to believe? [0] https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ftsa&q=USS+Liberty&ia=web https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ftsa&q=USS+Liberty&ia=web [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Liberty_incident https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Liberty_incident [2] https://www.britannica.com/event/USS-Liberty-incident https://www.britannica.com/event/USS-Liberty-incident [3] https://www.military.com/daily-news/2022/06/08/were-fed-it-survivors-of-uss-liberty-look-answers-55-years-later.html https://www.military.com/daily-news/2022/06/08/were-fed-it-s... Edit: Apparently (or at least that was claimed here[4]), GP was referring to searches on TikTok, not general web searches. I can neither confirm nor deny as I don't use that cesspit (or any other of those odious sewers). If it is true, it's just another good reason not to use that dumpster fire. [4] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47792757 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47792757
  - thaumasiotes 6mo ago
    > That's a lie. A search[0] shows these as the first three results: > [0] https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ftsa&q=USS+Liberty&ia=web https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ftsa&q=USS+Liberty&ia=web Hmmm. Someone with the barest modicum of honesty might have noticed that the comment above you was talking about searching on TikTok, not on DuckDuckGo.
    - nobody9999 6mo ago
      Oops. Missed that part. Not dishonesty, just carelessness. Since I'm old and don't use TikTok, I have no way to confirm or deny the results of searches on TikTok. If what GP claims (I doubt it) is true, that's certainly a problem and another reason why folks shouldn't use an entertainment platform to get their news.
      - unselect5917 6mo ago
        >If what GP claims (I doubt it) is true Here's a screenshot someone took of a TikTok search for "the uss liberty" https://x.com/hayasaka_aryan/status/1963236545231527957 https://x.com/hayasaka_aryan/status/1963236545231527957
        nobody9999 6mo ago
        I'd note that the link you posted is from September, 2025. Before any sale was made. What's more, the screenshot clearly shows that there's more beneath that message that's been cut off. I wonder what those results were?
    - unselect5917 6mo ago
      https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gz7RO0jXkAAWsW5?format=jpg&name=medium https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gz7RO0jXkAAWsW5?format=jpg&name=...
nothrabannosir 6mo ago
There’s discussions in a (thankfully banned) sub thread pulling this into question so I just wanted to add sources: > The short-form video-hosting service TikTok was under a de jure nationwide ban in the United States from January 19, 2025, until January 22, 2026, due to the US government's concerns over potential user data collection and influence operations by the government of the People's Republic of China. However, the ban was not enforced. The ban took effect after ByteDance, the China-based parent company of TikTok, refused to sell the service before the deadline of the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act (PAFACA). Prior to the ban, individual states, cities, universities, and government-affiliated devices had restricted TikTok. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Efforts_to_ban_TikTok_in_the_United_States https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Efforts_to_ban_TikTok_in_the_U... and: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protecting_Americans_from_Foreign_Adversary_Controlled_Applications_Act https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protecting_Americans_from_Fore... Amy Howe, Supreme Court upholds TikTok ban, SCOTUSblog (Jan. 17, 2025, 12:00 AM), https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/01/supreme-court-upholds-tiktok-ban/ https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/01/supreme-court-upholds-tik... https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24-656_ca7d.pdf https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24-656_ca7d.pdf The executive branch explicitly defied an act of Congress which was upheld by the Supreme Court. First Biden for one day, then Trump II as he took office and continued not to enforce the ban.

Notable exception: the TikTok ban.

unselect5917 6mo ago

[flagged]

nobody9999 6mo ago
>Now if you search for the USS Liberty, you get no results and instead a hardcoded link to a 'holocaust museum' website as the only result. That's a lie. A search[0] shows these as the first three results: USS Liberty incident - Wikipedia [1] USS Liberty incident | Facts, Deaths, & Investigation | Britannica [2] 'We're Fed Up With It': Survivors of the USS Liberty Look for Answers [3] In fact, the entire first page (and much of the second) of search results are specifically about the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty. There are no links to the Holocaust Museum anywhere to be found. Did you make up that lie yourself, or are you just blindly parroting what others tell you to believe? [0] https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ftsa&q=USS+Liberty&ia=web https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ftsa&q=USS+Liberty&ia=web [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Liberty_incident https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Liberty_incident [2] https://www.britannica.com/event/USS-Liberty-incident https://www.britannica.com/event/USS-Liberty-incident [3] https://www.military.com/daily-news/2022/06/08/were-fed-it-survivors-of-uss-liberty-look-answers-55-years-later.html https://www.military.com/daily-news/2022/06/08/were-fed-it-s... Edit: Apparently (or at least that was claimed here[4]), GP was referring to searches on TikTok, not general web searches. I can neither confirm nor deny as I don't use that cesspit (or any other of those odious sewers). If it is true, it's just another good reason not to use that dumpster fire. [4] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47792757 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47792757
- thaumasiotes 6mo ago
  > That's a lie. A search[0] shows these as the first three results: > [0] https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ftsa&q=USS+Liberty&ia=web https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ftsa&q=USS+Liberty&ia=web Hmmm. Someone with the barest modicum of honesty might have noticed that the comment above you was talking about searching on TikTok, not on DuckDuckGo.
  - nobody9999 6mo ago
    Oops. Missed that part. Not dishonesty, just carelessness. Since I'm old and don't use TikTok, I have no way to confirm or deny the results of searches on TikTok. If what GP claims (I doubt it) is true, that's certainly a problem and another reason why folks shouldn't use an entertainment platform to get their news.
    - unselect5917 6mo ago
      >If what GP claims (I doubt it) is true Here's a screenshot someone took of a TikTok search for "the uss liberty" https://x.com/hayasaka_aryan/status/1963236545231527957 https://x.com/hayasaka_aryan/status/1963236545231527957
      - nobody9999 6mo ago
        I'd note that the link you posted is from September, 2025. Before any sale was made. What's more, the screenshot clearly shows that there's more beneath that message that's been cut off. I wonder what those results were?
  - unselect5917 6mo ago
    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gz7RO0jXkAAWsW5?format=jpg&name=medium https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gz7RO0jXkAAWsW5?format=jpg&name=...

nothrabannosir 6mo ago

There’s discussions in a (thankfully banned) sub thread pulling this into question so I just wanted to add sources: > The short-form video-hosting service TikTok was under a de jure nationwide ban in the United States from January 19, 2025, until January 22, 2026, due to the US government's concerns over potential user data collection and influence operations by the government of the People's Republic of China. However, the ban was not enforced. The ban took effect after ByteDance, the China-based parent company of TikTok, refused to sell the service before the deadline of the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act (PAFACA). Prior to the ban, individual states, cities, universities, and government-affiliated devices had restricted TikTok. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Efforts_to_ban_TikTok_in_the_United_States https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Efforts_to_ban_TikTok_in_the_U... and: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protecting_Americans_from_Foreign_Adversary_Controlled_Applications_Act https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protecting_Americans_from_Fore... Amy Howe, Supreme Court upholds TikTok ban, SCOTUSblog (Jan. 17, 2025, 12:00 AM), https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/01/supreme-court-upholds-tiktok-ban/ https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/01/supreme-court-upholds-tik... https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24-656_ca7d.pdf https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24-656_ca7d.pdf The executive branch explicitly defied an act of Congress which was upheld by the Supreme Court. First Biden for one day, then Trump II as he took office and continued not to enforce the ban.