3 ms·
I'm wondering the same thing for India. Not the top but looks surprisingly surprisingly high. Perhaps I'm reading the data wrong.
by ankit_mishra 6mo ago
I'm wondering the same thing for India. Not the top but looks surprisingly surprisingly high. Perhaps I'm reading the data wrong.
- ggm 6mo agoReliance Jio deployed cheap native v6 and tool massive market share. They single-handedly moved the market. It's been discussed on the apnic blog and at meetings heaps
- toast0 6mo agoAdding on. Jio was a late entrant, so they could not get significant ipv4 address space without great expense. They deployed as mostly v6 with a tiny CGNAT. They also had an extensive 'pre-release' offering at zero cost to subscribers which got them a huge number of subscribers and clout to encourage internet services to offer ipv6.
- lazide 6mo agoIndia has about 1.5 billion people, and has only recently been getting most of them online. Less IPv4 legacy, and it has always been obvious that IPv4 was never going to be ‘enough’ to actually onboard everyone anyway. When I lived in India, everything had IPv6 out of the box.