5 ms·
I've got a spec for ipv11. Why? Because it's one more than 10.
by QuercusMax 6mo ago
I've got a spec for ipv11. Why? Because it's one more than 10.
- lamasery 6mo agoCan’t you just make ten… one larger?
- aragilar 6mo agoThey're referencing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Up_to_eleven https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Up_to_eleven (and you're one of today's lucky 10000: https://xkcd.com/1053/ https://xkcd.com/1053/).
- MattPalmer1086 6mo agoI think they are also riffing off the spinal tap scene, where he says "can't you just make 10 louder?".
- cassianoleal 6mo agoI think that's what your comment parent is referencing as well
- deleted 6mo ago[deleted]
- MattPalmer1086 6mo agoLooked like they missed that their parent post was already doing that. As another poster points out: wooosh!
- iainmerrick 6mo agoCan’t you just make the first post say “whoosh”, and have that be the post?
- MattPalmer1086 6mo agoHaha. But this post is one more :)
- lamasery 6mo agoI was mainly doing that, and more-obliquely making use of math/CS dork jokes like "1 + 1 = 3, for large values of 1".
- rikkert 6mo agowhoosh
- fredoralive 6mo agoI've got a spec for IPv2. Because of advances in carrier grade NAT, we can reduce the address field from 32 bits to 16, making amazing savings somehow.