3 ms·
I'm working on my IPv9 proposal as we speak. It has an LLM validating the contents of every packet. Gotta stay ahead of the curve.
by speedping 6mo ago
I'm working on my IPv9 proposal as we speak. It has an LLM validating the contents of every packet. Gotta stay ahead of the curve.
- QuercusMax 6mo agoI've got a spec for ipv11. Why? Because it's one more than 10.
- lamasery 6mo agoCan’t you just make ten… one larger?
- aragilar 6mo agoThey're referencing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Up_to_eleven https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Up_to_eleven (and you're one of today's lucky 10000: https://xkcd.com/1053/ https://xkcd.com/1053/).
- MattPalmer1086 6mo agoI think they are also riffing off the spinal tap scene, where he says "can't you just make 10 louder?".
- cassianoleal 6mo agoI think that's what your comment parent is referencing as well
- deleted 6mo ago[deleted]
- MattPalmer1086 6mo agoLooked like they missed that their parent post was already doing that. As another poster points out: wooosh!
- iainmerrick 6mo agoCan’t you just make the first post say “whoosh”, and have that be the post?
- MattPalmer1086 6mo agoHaha. But this post is one more :)
- lamasery 6mo agoI was mainly doing that, and more-obliquely making use of math/CS dork jokes like "1 + 1 = 3, for large values of 1".
- rikkert 6mo agowhoosh
- fredoralive 6mo agoI've got a spec for IPv2. Because of advances in carrier grade NAT, we can reduce the address field from 32 bits to 16, making amazing savings somehow.
- EmuAGR 6mo agoIs it backwards compatible with Windows 95/98? Maybe change the name to IPv10 just in case.