3 ms·
Not simply because it had defense contractors… You made an editorial choice to leave out the part about selling weapons to Israel to use against Gaza. Once ca
by dwaltrip 6mo ago
Not simply because it had defense contractors…
You made an editorial choice to leave out the part about selling weapons to Israel to use against Gaza.
Once can agree or disagree with the action to disrupt the career.
Either way, I find your omission a bit glaring.
- xdennis 6mo agoIt was omitted because it is irrelevant. It doesn't matter which ally the US sells weapons to. If the Gazans attacked Luxembourg, Luxembourgers have the right to defend themselves (and win) too.
- deleted 6mo ago[deleted]
- deleted 6mo ago[deleted]
- dwaltrip 6mo agoI apologize for bringing up irrelevant information.
- UberFly 6mo agoYou really should. It is self serving information.
- elAhmo 6mo agoI’m sure you’re also applying the same logic to Iran and saying they have a right to defend themselves?
- mangodrunk 6mo ago[dead]
- mangodrunk 6mo agoIs your omission of the attacks on October 7 carried out by Hamas equally glaring? How do you know what exactly Israel will do with the weapons? They presumably need this for defense as any country needs weapons for defending themselves.