4 ms·

Sure, but.. I've been coding for 40 years and I don't know everything. To me, a LOT depends on what the plumber asked chatgpt about. For example: building codes

by hn_acc1 6mo ago

Sure, but.. I've been coding for 40 years and I don't know everything. To me, a LOT depends on what the plumber asked chatgpt about. For example: building codes in that city, to figure out what his options are - like, is he allowed to just put in any old toilet, or is there a gpf restriction? What's the replacement part number for faucet XYZ's gasket? Those seem reasonable. "how do I fix a clogged toilet?" would be bad..

theappsecguy 6mo ago
[dead]
alpinisme 6mo ago
Presumably in his jurisdiction he should know what official resources to consult. But the point about it depending on his question is definitely fair.
SirMaster 6mo ago
>like, is he allowed to just put in any old toilet, or is there a gpf restriction? And if the LLM gets that wrong? It's his job to know the codes or how to go to a reliable resource to find out the correct codes.
- bethekidyouwant 6mo ago
  Maybe he just needs a reminder and he’ll have an oh yeah moment when he reads the output maybe he’ll ask it for primary sources. There’s a lot of bad faith going around.
- Calazon 6mo ago
  Hopefully he would be using the LLM as an enhanced search engine that can point him to relevant authoritative sources that he can use to fact-check its output. I have done that in the past to some effect.
  - sarchertech 6mo ago
    People don’t understand they need to do that.
sidrag22 6mo ago
I cling a bit to a prompt i sent a while ago about just tossing a chopped pepper into a recipe for baked ziti. I had a recipe that i followed fairly tightly with slight changes to see how they would work out each time. Instead of prompting "when should i add chopped bell pepper?" the small change of just, "what are my options for when to add chopped bell pepper?" opened up a variety of different methods i could try when returning to that recipe, and decide what i like best based on the outcome. The first prompt style is I think a way society towards drifts incidentally towards a less interesting one, with less variety in solutions. The second one i think allows people to still exercise their potential to try a variety of things and keep that variety.

by hn_acc1 6mo ago

theappsecguy 6mo ago

[dead]

alpinisme 6mo ago

Presumably in his jurisdiction he should know what official resources to consult. But the point about it depending on his question is definitely fair.

SirMaster 6mo ago

>like, is he allowed to just put in any old toilet, or is there a gpf restriction? And if the LLM gets that wrong? It's his job to know the codes or how to go to a reliable resource to find out the correct codes.

bethekidyouwant 6mo ago
Maybe he just needs a reminder and he’ll have an oh yeah moment when he reads the output maybe he’ll ask it for primary sources. There’s a lot of bad faith going around.
Calazon 6mo ago
Hopefully he would be using the LLM as an enhanced search engine that can point him to relevant authoritative sources that he can use to fact-check its output. I have done that in the past to some effect.
- sarchertech 6mo ago
  People don’t understand they need to do that.

sidrag22 6mo ago

I cling a bit to a prompt i sent a while ago about just tossing a chopped pepper into a recipe for baked ziti. I had a recipe that i followed fairly tightly with slight changes to see how they would work out each time. Instead of prompting "when should i add chopped bell pepper?" the small change of just, "what are my options for when to add chopped bell pepper?" opened up a variety of different methods i could try when returning to that recipe, and decide what i like best based on the outcome. The first prompt style is I think a way society towards drifts incidentally towards a less interesting one, with less variety in solutions. The second one i think allows people to still exercise their potential to try a variety of things and keep that variety.