3 ms·
This is happening quite a lot actually. People just feed an existing project into their agent harness and have it regenerate more or less the same with a few tw
by short_sells_poo 6mo ago
This is happening quite a lot actually. People just feed an existing project into their agent harness and have it regenerate more or less the same with a few tweaks and then they publish it.
I'm not sure how this works in the legal sense. A human could ostensibly study an existing project and then rewrite it from scratch. The original work's license shouldn't apply as long as code wasn't copy & pasted, right?
What happens when an automated tool does the same? It's basically just a complicated copy & paste job.
- kelnos 6mo ago> A human could ostensibly study an existing project and then rewrite it from scratch. And likely there would be enough similarities that the rewrite would be considered a derived work under copyright law. > The original work's license shouldn't apply as long as code wasn't copy & pasted, right? You don't need to do a literal copy & paste for it to be copyright infringement. > What happens when an automated tool does the same? It's basically just a complicated copy & paste job. Sounds like copyright infringement to me.