3 ms·
Looks roughly as smooth as it looked on my 25mhz 386
by lizardking 6mo ago
Looks roughly as smooth as it looked on my 25mhz 386
- fipar 6mo agoOn my 33mhz (I'm almost, but not quite sure about the frequency) 486 SX (yeah ...) it ran OK until the levels where you'd get a lot of monsters. In those, I had to zoom in to the smallest possible screen size and even then it was barely acceptable. So while the video is impressive and I couldn't do something like this myself, I was glad when I saw how bad it ran, as that computer of mine would a little bit more than 30yo today, so to have that beat by a 40yo printer controller would make me think I could have done something to have it run better back then!
- saltcured 6mo agoPlaying DooM on a slow machine was training for any future fire fights you might need to do in a dark room lit only by flash bulbs.
- hyperman1 6mo agoI had a 386 with 40Mhz (which does not exist, so in hindsight it must have been a clone chip) and 4MB Ram. I could run all Doom 2 levels with reasonable speed, except the last one, where 4mb just wasn't enough.
- bombcar 6mo agoProbably AMD’s: https://redhill.net.au/c/c-4.php https://redhill.net.au/c/c-4.php