3 ms·
Not sure that's what I was getting at. People in camp 2 don't think an LLM can take over the job of a real software engineer. It's people in camp 1 that I wond
by xienze 6mo ago
Not sure that's what I was getting at. People in camp 2 don't think an LLM can take over the job of a real software engineer.
It's people in camp 1 that I wonder about. They're convinced that LLMs can accomplish anything and understand a codebase better than anyone (and that may be the case!). However, they're simultaneously convinced that they'll still be needed to do the prompting because ???reasons???.
- paleotrope 6mo agoI was thinking today that I need to pivot to making and selling shovels, but then other issue is is anyone going to need shovels in the future.
- TheGRS 6mo agoOne explanation is that some think we might be getting to the limits of what an LLM can reasonably do. There's a lot of functions of any job that are not easily translated to an LLM and are much more about interacting with people or critical thinking in a way LLMs can't do. I'm not sure if that's everyone's rationale but that's my personal view of the situation. Like the jobs will change but we likely won't be losing them to AI outright.