3 ms·

Second this. Their API is such a breeze and it is so much more automation friendly than any other messenger platform. It has a good adoption % too, otherwise Si

by neya 6mo ago

Second this. Their API is such a breeze and it is so much more automation friendly than any other messenger platform. It has a good adoption % too, otherwise Signal is the real winner if we account for privacy.

tcfhgj 6mo ago
Even more automation friendly than Matrix?
- neya 6mo ago
  Unfortunately, I haven't used Matrix personally enough to comment, sorry. But, I've heard only good things about it so far.
- morphology 6mo ago
  It's a bit less automation-friendly because the UX is not great when the bot doesn't have its own phone number (which costs money). I think it has better privacy, though. Matrix server operators can read message metadata.
  - tcfhgj 6mo ago
    Telegram server operators can read message meta data and messages
    - morphology 6mo ago
      You're right, Matrix is a much better option than Telegram. I misread the thread as comparing Signal to Matrix.