3 ms·
It’s about supply and demand. Luxury grocers provide a shopping “experience”, where low cost grocers do not. In a luxury neighborhood it would make sense the sh
by halflife 6mo ago
It’s about supply and demand. Luxury grocers provide a shopping “experience”, where low cost grocers do not. In a luxury neighborhood it would make sense the shoppers are looking for experience more so than low cost.
- wahnfrieden 6mo agoThe neighborhoods I'm talking about also have many people living in poverty or near it. Looks like you live in Israel which is perhaps less integrated / more segregated than Brooklyn (I don't know though, I haven't been to see first hand)
- rsynnott 6mo agoWhat’s a ‘luxury neighborhood’? In any large city, most central areas are generally a bit of a mix; “this is only for rich/poor people” is more of a suburban phenomenon. If the shops are only catering to the high end, a problem can develop. (I am less sure why this happens to such a great extent in large US cities vs elsewhere, vs more of a balance of shops, but it does seem to.)
- wahnfrieden 6mo agoThe poster appears to be Israeli. I’m not an expert and have never been but I understand spatial wealth segregation is quite extreme there and may explain their take. Here’s one study: https://www.ref-inst.org/en/articles-and-studies/spatial-inequality-in-israel-tal-and-leventhal https://www.ref-inst.org/en/articles-and-studies/spatial-ine... So it may just be that where they are from, the concept of “luxury neighborhoods” which do not need to cater to the poor and disadvantaged populations does indeed exist, due to segregation factors