> there's a cannabis verification gate, then routing into disease vs pest vs deficiency, then narrower classifiers from there. Each one has a simpler job so acc

> there's a cannabis verification gate, then routing into disease vs pest vs deficiency, then narrower classifiers from there. Each one has a simpler job so accuracy stays high. That never occurred to me. That's a great insight. > I'd pick the single highest-value species, collect a probably-uncomfortable amount of well-labeled data for just that one I think you're right. If I want to move forward with it I think it's the only feasible way to validate a proof of concept. Generalizing can't produce a useful tool at my scale. Thank you! I think this was a helpful nudge. Narrow classifiers could make some things a lot easier. Do you know of any reading materials about routing like this? Is it just programmatic decision tree stuff, or is there something more clever I'm unaware of?