3 ms·
didn’t we have several antitrust cases where a vendor used its monopoly to disadvantage rivals? did not anthropic block openclaw?
by netdur 6mo ago
didn’t we have several antitrust cases where a vendor used its monopoly to disadvantage rivals? did not anthropic block openclaw?
- andai 6mo agoIt's not blocked, you just can't use the Claude-only subscription endpoint with unauthorized 3rd party software. (You can use it via the regular API (7x more expensive) and pay per token just fine.) ...Except now you sorta-kinda can: now they auto-detect 3rd party stuff and bill you per-token for it? If I'm reading it right: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47633568 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47633568
- dmix 6mo agoHow is Anthropic a monopoly? The market is barely even fully developed and has multiple large and small competitors
- Someone1234 6mo agoThey did not. You can still use OpenClaw on their API pricing tier as much as you want. What they did is not allow subscriptions to be used to power automated third-party workloads, including OpenClaw. Now, is their messaging around this confusing? Absolutely. The whole thing has been handled shambolically. Everyone knows that they lack the compute to keep up, and likely have lower margins on subscriptions than API; but they cannot just say that because investors may be skittish.