3 ms·
Still no moat. The reason someone would use this vs. third-party alternatives is still the fact that the $200/mo subscription is markedly cheaper than per-toke
by airstrike 6mo ago
Still no moat.
The reason someone would use this vs. third-party alternatives is still the fact that the $200/mo subscription is markedly cheaper than per-token API billing.
Not sure how this works out in the long term when switching costs are virtually zero.
- petesergeant 6mo agoI think at this point the aim is less about moat, and more about getting an advantage that self-sustains: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA4444-1.html https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA4444-1.html
- TacticalCoder 6mo ago> Not sure how this works out in the long term when switching costs are virtually zero. All these not really helpful, but vendor specific, "bonuses" sounds like a way to try to lock people in, to try to raise the switching cost. I'm using, on purpose, a simple process so that at any time I can switch AI provider.
- fredericgalline 6mo ago[dead]