3 ms·
If a user has an "opt-out" button or signal it should be wired up to a system that functions as such. This is just a software engineering, you could vibe-code
by tlibert 6mo ago
If a user has an "opt-out" button or signal it should be wired up to a system that functions as such. This is just a software engineering, you could vibe-code a fix in ten minutes.
- Zetaphor 6mo agoYou are assuming this was simply a development oversight and not part of a larger systemic issue
- tlibert 6mo agoOh, I very much am not.
- pixel_popping 6mo agoExactly, this is wanted, why would Google not exploit your data "opted-out"? That makes no-sense from their business point of view.
- pixel_popping 6mo agoOpt-out still goes through their servers, which means unsecure. We use encryption everywhere to not trust the middle layer, if it transits somewhere in cleartext, then it's logged and eventually used later-on. I genuinely believe that people are insane to think otherwise, proof is that there has been millions(billions?) issued in fines for non-respect of this specific issue, why are people still having "hope"? It doesn't make sense, it's THERE, it's in THEIR DB. The same goes for LLMs of course, every prompts is recorded and will be used, be sure of that.