4 ms·
A good effort, but i failed to see any use case why someone will select Lumina over TypeScript. Infact Lumina itself is written in TypeScript.
by tegeek 6mo ago
A good effort, but i failed to see any use case why someone will select Lumina over TypeScript. Infact Lumina itself is written in TypeScript.
- embedding-shape 6mo agoI'd also steer clear of any language using TypeScript for the compiler itself, even TypeScript themselves don't want to use TypeScript anymore for the compiler, don't make the same mistake yourself.
- deleted 6mo ago[deleted]
- afavour 6mo agoSurely the ability to compile your WASM is a pretty big benefit over TypeScript, if it’s something you need.
- pjmlp 6mo agoAssemblyScript exists.
- afavour 6mo agoSure. It isn’t TypeScript though.
- pjmlp 6mo agoC subset + compiler extensions for some embedded systems isn't proper C, and people still call it C, given how close enough it is.
- spankalee 6mo agoAssemblyScript seems to be seriously languishing these days, and the team has falling-outs with a lot of the Wasm ecosystem.
- pjmlp 6mo agoWhich I actually agree with, as the Wasm ecosystem is trying to be yet another UNCOL outside the browser, bringing CORBA back while pretending it is some great new idea.