2 ms·

> The problem is, there are two conceptions of the back button, and the browser only implements one. In web browsers, there is only one concept. There is no c

> The problem is, there are two conceptions of the back button, and the browser only implements one. In web browsers, there is only one concept. There is no concept of "up one level in the heirarchy". If you want that make your own button in your website.

deleted 6mo ago
[deleted]
blooalien 6mo ago
> There is no concept of "up one level in the heirarchy". If you want that make your own button in your website. https://lifehacker.com/how-to-move-up-one-url-level-in-chrome-and-firefox-5782898 https://lifehacker.com/how-to-move-up-one-url-level-in-chrom... *shrug*
- hrimfaxi 6mo ago
  > Chrome/Firefox: Ever been reading a site and wish not to go back to the last page you visited, but the last page in that web site's hierarchy? This statement makes no sense to non-tech people. Most people don't think of sites hierarchically, at least not from a url path perspective.
- sznio 6mo ago
  amazing, took me 5 clicks of the back button to finally get back from that link
- christoph 6mo ago
  Isn't the problem already solved at the browser level? Most (all?) modern browsers support a press/click & hold of the back button to view the back history and quickly jump to any page in that tab's history. *Edit - I left this in the wrong place, those extensions behave slightly differently.
- Arainach 6mo ago
  Those are third party extensions, not browser features, and they're not consistently applied. Going from an image to a root domain is not a hierarchy and as a pathological data hoarder who has downloaded a lot of images from a lot of sites I don't understand why I'd ever want that feature. It's wild that that's their first example use case on the article. Similarly, going from page N of results to page 1 isn't "up a level in heirarchy".
deleted 6mo ago
[deleted]
Baljhin 6mo ago
Agreed. I remember addons from the XUL Firefox era that did this. I miss that feature. And that era.

deleted 6mo ago

[deleted]

blooalien 6mo ago

> There is no concept of "up one level in the heirarchy". If you want that make your own button in your website. https://lifehacker.com/how-to-move-up-one-url-level-in-chrome-and-firefox-5782898 https://lifehacker.com/how-to-move-up-one-url-level-in-chrom... *shrug*

hrimfaxi 6mo ago
> Chrome/Firefox: Ever been reading a site and wish not to go back to the last page you visited, but the last page in that web site's hierarchy? This statement makes no sense to non-tech people. Most people don't think of sites hierarchically, at least not from a url path perspective.
sznio 6mo ago
amazing, took me 5 clicks of the back button to finally get back from that link
christoph 6mo ago
Isn't the problem already solved at the browser level? Most (all?) modern browsers support a press/click & hold of the back button to view the back history and quickly jump to any page in that tab's history. *Edit - I left this in the wrong place, those extensions behave slightly differently.
Arainach 6mo ago
Those are third party extensions, not browser features, and they're not consistently applied. Going from an image to a root domain is not a hierarchy and as a pathological data hoarder who has downloaded a lot of images from a lot of sites I don't understand why I'd ever want that feature. It's wild that that's their first example use case on the article. Similarly, going from page N of results to page 1 isn't "up a level in heirarchy".

deleted 6mo ago

[deleted]

Baljhin 6mo ago

Agreed. I remember addons from the XUL Firefox era that did this. I miss that feature. And that era.