3 ms·
We can define a Dyson Sphere in math. We cannot build one. AI outputting axiomatically valid syntax isn't going to be all that useful. It's possible to genera
by yabutlivnWoods 6mo ago
We can define a Dyson Sphere in math.
We cannot build one.
AI outputting axiomatically valid syntax isn't going to be all that useful. It's possible to generate all axiomatically correct math with a for loop until the machine OOMs
Physics is not math and math is not physics.
- djsjajah 6mo agoYou just failed the Turing test.
- goatlover 6mo agoThe Turing test just failed you. I'll go one better, physics isn't reality, it's a model of reality utilizing math.
- johnthescott 6mo agowe only perceive the past.
- dugidugout 6mo agoAnd I'll go one better, you haven't said anything here at all, you've just left a representation of what you understand to be saying.
- keyle 6mo agoMaybe he passed the Turing test with 88.2% which is 1.8% higher than the competition.
- yabutlivnWoods 6mo agoFortunately for me equivalents to Turing exist: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turing_machine_equivalents https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turing_machine_equivalents
- djsjajah 6mo agoI don't follow. Can you explain how your comment is relevant to mine? It might help if you also explain how you interpreted my comment.