4 ms·
> Historically This is not the history, it is a mythology in opposition to the empirical evidence. Which is why you should read Graeber.
by jasonwatkinspdx 6mo ago
> Historically
This is not the history, it is a mythology in opposition to the empirical evidence.
Which is why you should read Graeber.
- zozbot234 6mo agoIt's history of ideas. What Graeber says is ultimately aligned to this, as I pointed out in a sibling thread.
- jasonwatkinspdx 6mo agoYes, and your comment makes clear you haven't actually read Graeber and mischaracterized his work. Anyhow, replying is clearly past the point of utility here.