3 ms·
I didn't say it was devoid of substance, the poll part is actually interesting (and worth discussing!) it's just that it actually appears *after* the sloppy twe
by belval 6mo ago
I didn't say it was devoid of substance, the poll part is actually interesting (and worth discussing!) it's just that it actually appears *after* the sloppy tweets and "someone pretended to shoot at Sam Altman's house" screenshot as if that was somehow relevant.
- JumpCrisscross 6mo agoThat might be rage porn. Whatever. Highlighting despicable people on Twitter gets clicks.
- NooneAtAll3 6mo ago"whatever" is exactly the "bad reporting" complaint GP is making
- JumpCrisscross 6mo agoFair enough. It would be better if they interviewed actual people. Barring that, the tweets add colour to the data.