4 ms·
Somebody has to bring a new case that presents a novel legal theory/presentation that isn't clearly addressed by the ruling that forms the precedent.
by PaulDavisThe1st 7mo ago
Somebody has to bring a new case that presents a novel legal theory/presentation that isn't clearly addressed by the ruling that forms the precedent.
- djoldman 7mo agoAdditionally, one can argue that the state of the world has changed enough that assumptions made by the USC at the time of precedence require reversal.
- sdenton4 7mo agoThe court is stacked with so called originalists - history stopped in the eighteenth century.
- franga2000 7mo agoidk, they wouldn't have given the president nearly absolute immunity back then..
- IAmBroom 7mo agoYes, they are insincere "originalists". This is known.
- PaulDavisThe1st 7mo agoonly in a new case ....