2 ms·
You say that like interstate commerce regulation was more egregious for wheat than it was for marijuana. But Raich is significantly more egregious: the theory
by thaumasiotes 7mo ago
You say that like interstate commerce regulation was more egregious for wheat than it was for marijuana.
But Raich is significantly more egregious: the theory on which the government won Wickard v. Filburn, that private consumption of wheat could affect the interstate market for wheat, doesn't even apply, because there can be no interstate market in a substance that is illegal to trade.
- ianferrel 7mo ago>there can be no interstate market in a substance that is illegal to trade. There is in fact an interstate market in many substances that are illegal to trade because laws against things do not make those things fail to exist.
- PaulDavisThe1st 7mo agoNo market that the federal government can recognize, tax or regulate
- lmm 7mo agoIllegal commerce is still subject to taxation and regulation, famously so in the case of Al Capone.
- IAmBroom 7mo agoLegally subject to. Practically, untaxed.
- zdragnar 7mo agoBy making it illegal, it has already been regulated. The IRS also requires reporting and taxing all income, even that which was unlawfully gained.
- gowld 7mo agoThe reason marijuana is Federally illegal in the first place is because the commerce clause is interpreted to allow it.