> That's not how it's done. Its not how it was done because of NAT. You just couldn't have done it that way for a long time. We don't need NAT anymore. > For

> That's not how it's done. Its not how it was done because of NAT. You just couldn't have done it that way for a long time. We don't need NAT anymore. > For the reasons I explained before, mainly LAN security and DNS not working with dynamic IP allocations But once again, its not actually changing the security characteristics at all compared to choosing weird ports and having to deal with reflection issues. The service is still opened either way, just one requires you to choose other ports.