3 ms·
The controlling case is Wickard v Filburn (1942). A farmer was told he could only grow X acres of feed on his own land; feed that he had no intention of sellin
by codexb 6mo ago
The controlling case is Wickard v Filburn (1942).
A farmer was told he could only grow X acres of feed on his own land; feed that he had no intention of selling and was being fed entirely to his own livestock on the same land.
This seems to overturn that in part, but until Wickard is overturned, and the interstate commerce clause reigned in, there will be weird side effects of it like this.
- semiquaver 6mo agoCircuit courts may not overrule Supreme Court precedent. Accordingly, this decision purports to rest on the “Necessary and Proper” clause, avoiding Wickard (decided on commerce clause grounds)
- wahern 6mo agoIn particular, Necessary and Proper as it relates to the taxing power, which the challenged statute relied upon, having been passed decades before the scope of Commerce Clause powers began their expansion, let alone Wickard v. Filburn.
- gowld 6mo ago> Circuit courts may not overrule Supreme Court precedent. That's a Supreme Court opinion that only applies if the new case reaches their docket and gets reaffirmed.
- HWR_14 6mo agoHow does the supreme court revisit precedents if the circuit court doesn't readdress the issue?
- PaulDavisThe1st 6mo agoSomebody has to bring a new case that presents a novel legal theory/presentation that isn't clearly addressed by the ruling that forms the precedent.
- djoldman 6mo agoAdditionally, one can argue that the state of the world has changed enough that assumptions made by the USC at the time of precedence require reversal.
- sdenton4 6mo agoThe court is stacked with so called originalists - history stopped in the eighteenth century.
- franga2000 6mo agoidk, they wouldn't have given the president nearly absolute immunity back then..
- IAmBroom 6mo agoYes, they are insincere "originalists". This is known.
- PaulDavisThe1st 6mo agoonly in a new case ....
- pdonis 6mo agoThe party that wants the precedent reversed loses in the lower court (because the lower court is bound by current Supreme Court precedent) and appeals to the Supreme Court. The canonical historical example is Brown v. Board of Education, which was appealed to the Supreme Court explicitly to ask them to reverse Plessy v. Ferguson, which lower courts had relied on as precedent.
- bell-cot 6mo agoThere's a lot of context (behind Wickard v Filburn) which would obviously not apply to anyone distilling for personal consumption: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wickard_v._Filburn https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wickard_v._Filburn