2 ms·
"Yes. It's a mostly shitty but very fast and relatively inexpensive replacement for things that already exist." Wouldn't that apply to most technological advan
by vjvjvjvjghv 7mo ago
"Yes. It's a mostly shitty but very fast and relatively inexpensive replacement for things that already exist."
Wouldn't that apply to most technological advances? Cars, computers, cell phones.
- dodu_ 7mo agoYes, but I'm not the one who introduced the "novel" constraint to the argument. e: Also I don't know that I'd strictly bucket these specific examples you gave as shittier versions, though I guess that's a matter of perspective.