> the main use case for RISC-V has been providing access to CPU technology for regimes under sanctions Here is a US based company that just raised another $400

> the main use case for RISC-V has been providing access to CPU technology for regimes under sanctions Here is a US based company that just raised another $400 million to push RISC-V in the datacenter. They claim to have ARM Neoverse N2 performance in US datacenters already. https://www.sifive.com/blog/investing-in-our-next-chapter-of-growth https://www.sifive.com/blog/investing-in-our-next-chapter-of... Here is NASA standardizing on chips from the same company: https://www.sifive.com/press/nasa-selects-sifive-and-makes-risc-v-the-go-to-ecosystem https://www.sifive.com/press/nasa-selects-sifive-and-makes-r... And here are the Chinese Zhenwu 810E RISC-V chips for AI training and inference and the XuanTie C950 chips for cloud servers. Uniquely, RISC-V chips are avaiable regardless of which team you decide are the bad guys. And, after decades of reliance on an ecosystem, if your RISC-V supplier becomes erratic, unreliable, and unethical you can source your RISC-V tech somewhere else or even create your own. With any other ISA, you are stuck.