6 ms·
I think that glass is under-appreciated. Without it we would not have telescopes and microscopes (and all the scientific (and later engineering) that came from
by throw0101a 6mo ago
I think that glass is under-appreciated. Without it we would not have telescopes and microscopes (and all the scientific (and later engineering) that came from them), and later movies and photography—the latter also led to photolithography.
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glass https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glass
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telescope https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telescope
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microscope https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microscope
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photolithography https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photolithography
Nevermind the day-to-day quality of life improvements of eye glasses. Also:
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_fiber https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_fiber
Would also need laters: modern communications would be much different if we still had to use copper cable (esp. over long distances), or microwave relays.
- markoman 6mo agoAgree; and pair this with the revelations and achievements in optical engineering, lest it go unmentioned.