> Making Linux distro maintainers responsible instead (duplicating work). As this has been one (but not the only) of my arguments, the wording is a little off,

> Making Linux distro maintainers responsible instead (duplicating work). As this has been one (but not the only) of my arguments, the wording is a little off, I think. Rather, the argument is really also about using "stable" rather than bleeding edge software and doing some third-party vetting in-between; cf. also https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47585172 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47585172