3 ms·

Source? I've only seen him post religious stuff on his personal social media.

by KK7NIL 6mo ago

wewewedxfgdf 6mo ago
If you are the CEO of Intel then posting from your personal account is the same thing - you are the CEO - it's not private. This is just scratching the surface - his religious posts went on and on and on whilst he was Intel CEO. https://gizmodo.com/things-are-so-bad-at-intel-that-the-boss-is-posting-bible-verses-2000483248 https://gizmodo.com/things-are-so-bad-at-intel-that-the-boss... https://www.indiatoday.in/technology/news/story/intel-facing-tough-time-ceo-is-now-quoting-bible-on-twitter-2577045-2024-08-05 https://www.indiatoday.in/technology/news/story/intel-facing... https://www.reddit.com/r/intel/comments/1hb1imh/former_intel_ceo_pat_gelsinger_calls_for_prayer/ https://www.reddit.com/r/intel/comments/1hb1imh/former_intel... https://x.com/PGelsinger/status/1891069258953576711 https://x.com/PGelsinger/status/1891069258953576711 https://x.com/dylan522p/status/1820503612591919375 https://x.com/dylan522p/status/1820503612591919375 https://x.com/dylan522p/status/1701081984943227367 https://x.com/dylan522p/status/1701081984943227367 https://x.com/PGelsinger/status/1820129317122080977 https://x.com/PGelsinger/status/1820129317122080977
- mort96 6mo ago
  This looks like a motte-and-bailey. Your original comment, the bailey: "he posted much religious stuff from official Intel accounts". This comment, the motte: "he posted much religious stuff". You could've just said, "I thought it was extremely strange that he posted so much religious stuff while CEO". That would've been a very defensible position. You didn't need the false part of posting from official Intel accounts. Or, if it was an honest mistake, you should've written something along the lines of: "Sorry, I misremembered, it was his personal accounts. But when you're a CEO, I don't think the distinction matters much; anything you post will be read as 'Intel's CEO says'".

Source? I've only seen him post religious stuff on his personal social media.

by KK7NIL 6mo ago

Source? I've only seen him post religious stuff on his personal social media.

If you are the CEO of Intel then posting from your personal account is the same thing - you are the CEO - it's not private. This is just scratching the surface - his religious posts went on and on and on whilst he was Intel CEO. https://gizmodo.com/things-are-so-bad-at-intel-that-the-boss-is-posting-bible-verses-2000483248 https://gizmodo.com/things-are-so-bad-at-intel-that-the-boss... https://www.indiatoday.in/technology/news/story/intel-facing-tough-time-ceo-is-now-quoting-bible-on-twitter-2577045-2024-08-05 https://www.indiatoday.in/technology/news/story/intel-facing... https://www.reddit.com/r/intel/comments/1hb1imh/former_intel_ceo_pat_gelsinger_calls_for_prayer/ https://www.reddit.com/r/intel/comments/1hb1imh/former_intel... https://x.com/PGelsinger/status/1891069258953576711 https://x.com/PGelsinger/status/1891069258953576711 https://x.com/dylan522p/status/1820503612591919375 https://x.com/dylan522p/status/1820503612591919375 https://x.com/dylan522p/status/1701081984943227367 https://x.com/dylan522p/status/1701081984943227367 https://x.com/PGelsinger/status/1820129317122080977 https://x.com/PGelsinger/status/1820129317122080977

mort96 6mo ago
This looks like a motte-and-bailey. Your original comment, the bailey: "he posted much religious stuff from official Intel accounts". This comment, the motte: "he posted much religious stuff". You could've just said, "I thought it was extremely strange that he posted so much religious stuff while CEO". That would've been a very defensible position. You didn't need the false part of posting from official Intel accounts. Or, if it was an honest mistake, you should've written something along the lines of: "Sorry, I misremembered, it was his personal accounts. But when you're a CEO, I don't think the distinction matters much; anything you post will be read as 'Intel's CEO says'".