4 ms·
Past performance doesn't guarantee future performance. Otherwise xkcd https://xkcd.com/605/ https://xkcd.com/605/ would be true.
by Ygg2 6mo ago
Past performance doesn't guarantee future performance. Otherwise xkcd https://xkcd.com/605/ https://xkcd.com/605/ would be true.
- spwa4 6mo agoUsing stock market wisdom to criticize the US, and defend "multipolar" countries like China and Russia? Love it!
- gunsle 6mo agoYou’ll never get an honest conversation on this topic from these people. They’ve been allowing themselves to steep in America bad doomer “news” content for decades to the point these people can’t tell up from down. Every year the discussions here get closer and closer to Reddit slop, with the same exact talking points and acceptable spectrum of ideas.
- sveme 6mo agoDo you really think the American empire is never to be challenged? Everything and everyone goes down after a while. Whether it‘s now is unclear, though the active resentment against the US is unprecedented. Sadly, your comment lacks any substance to argue with, all there is are unsubstantiated ad hominems. Sad.
- spwa4 6mo agoNo I'm a realist and realize that all candidates (CERTAINLY China and Russia, but even EU if we're honest) are far, far worse than "the American empire".
- MiguelX413 6mo agoHow is the EU worse?
- spwa4 6mo agoLast time any part of the EU was anything close to hegemonic was before WW2. Perhaps you should look up how peaceful that period was.
- MiguelX413 6mo agoI don't think it follows.
- sveme 6mo agoMultipolar doesn't mean replacement of hegemon. It's also two different things, you might be right that China, Russia or the EU would be worse as a hegemon, but that doesn't imply that it wouldn't happen. Being a realist would imply that you would understand that a fundamentally worse hegemon could still replace an existing hegemon.
- Ygg2 6mo agoInteresting. I merely pointed the flaw in your logic. You assumed I'm some multipolar proponent.