4 ms·
That’s the difference. In practice a human has to commit fraud to do this. But a human just using an LLM to generate code will do it accidentally. The differen
by sarchertech 6mo ago
That’s the difference. In practice a human has to commit fraud to do this.
But a human just using an LLM to generate code will do it accidentally. The difference is that regurgitation of training text is a documented failure mode of LLMs.
And there’s no way for the human using it to be aware it’s happening.
- testing22321 6mo agoYou can not accidentally sign your name saying “this code is GPL compliant” If you can’t be sure, don’t sign.
- sarchertech 6mo agoI’m not gonna. A lot of other people now will.
- testing22321 6mo agoWell yes, people break the law and expose themselves to liability everyday. Nothing new there.
- sarchertech 6mo agoAre far as I know there’s one incidence of a company asserting copyright infringement against the Linux kernel, even if I’ve missed a few, it doesn’t have frequently. That will change with AI generated code, and it exposes everyone commercial entity that distributes Linux in any form to liability.