4 ms·
It doesn't change the fact that there is no actual causal evidence. Perhaps the demented brains simply suck at flushing out microplastics as well. If you ever f
by sigmoid10 6mo ago
It doesn't change the fact that there is no actual causal evidence. Perhaps the demented brains simply suck at flushing out microplastics as well. If you ever find people with more microplastics exposure have more dementia (like they did for asbestos and lung cancer), then you're onto something. But no rigorous study has found this yet. And if they do, you will hear of it immediately for sure, given how much reporting there is for microplastics=bad for you.
- strogonoff 6mo agoStrictly speaking, there is no “actual casual evidence” for anything, because there is hardly any stable definition for what casual evidence exactly is. Establishment of causality is commonly considered as requiring repetition and probabilistic reasoning. In plain words, it’s your guess against theirs, except they had done research and published a paper with a claim and you are simply saying they are not rigorous enough. Could you point to more rigorous support of your claim?