It would be provocative if there weren't proof or logical conclusions. The proof is the benchmarks. The logical conclusion is that a company that's been doing t

It would be provocative if there weren't proof or logical conclusions. The proof is the benchmarks. The logical conclusion is that a company that's been doing this 6 years longer has a bit more experience. And putting the models aside, Anthropic has possibly the worst reliability of any AI inference provider, is slower, more expensive, with an absolute mess of product rollout/management - but granted, all those things aren't the model. When you actually can use Anthropic models, the only thing it beats GPT at is SWE.