3 ms·
I think you read it backwards - that's a possible consequence of P==NP, not P!=NP.
by fwip 6mo ago
I think you read it backwards - that's a possible consequence of P==NP, not P!=NP.
- nine_k 6mo agoYes, I meant the equality. We already operate on the assumption that P ≠ NP, so little would change if that were proved.