Peer review is a joke. It's anti-knowledge and status gatekeeping. In the context of math, I am technically a peer. Yet the stuff I find the most interesting is

Peer review is a joke. It's anti-knowledge and status gatekeeping. In the context of math, I am technically a peer. Yet the stuff I find the most interesting is typically not in journals or only on arxiv, even though the journals claim or purport to be curating content of interest to the "general math community".