3 ms·
All code must be compatible with GPL-2.0-only Am I being too pedantic if I point out that it is quite possible for code to be compatible with GPL-2.0 and other
by dec0dedab0de 6mo ago
All code must be compatible with GPL-2.0-only
Am I being too pedantic if I point out that it is quite possible for code to be compatible with GPL-2.0 and other licenses at the same time? Or is this a term that is well understood?
- philipov 6mo agoGPL-2.0-only is the name of a license. One word. It is an alternative to GPL-2.0-or-later.
- kbelder 6mo agoRight, the final hyphen changes the meaning of the sentence. "GPL-2.0-only" "GPL-2.0 only"
- compyman 6mo agoYou might be being too pedantic :) https://spdx.org/licenses/GPL-2.0-only.html https://spdx.org/licenses/GPL-2.0-only.html It's a specific GPL license (as opposed to GPL 2.0-later)