3 ms·

https://archive.ph/aoXIY https://archive.ph/aoXIY @dang didn't see this post before posting the archive.ph link at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4772234

by nickvec 6mo ago

https://archive.ph/aoXIY https://archive.ph/aoXIY @dang didn't see this post before posting the archive.ph link at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47722344 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47722344 - feel free to delete/merge that thread with this one

lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 6mo ago
You should link to the actual source and include the archive link as the post text or as a top-level comment. The domain displayed next to the link will otherwise be the archive domain, which does not inform readers about the source. Also, @mentions are not implemented on HN; email hn@ycombinator.com to get mod attention. (And you can confirm with them what I wrote about archive links.)
- gnabgib 6mo ago
  The link goes to a dead post (because archive - but there's nothing to merge), you're posting to an account that has posted/failed with archive links before and used @ before.. not sure what you're hoping for here.
  - lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 6mo ago
    I am hoping to inform them? It does not appear their comments with attempted @mentions have informative replies, and posting a link to an archive domain will mean it's dead-on-arrival. Unless someone vouches and then comments on one of those posts, there isn't really an opportunity for a commenter to tell them. I suppose part of your point is that they should be able to see that the post is dead; that regardless does not tell them why the post is dead. I'm also not totally convinced they can see that the post is dead. When an account is shadow-banned on this forum they can still log in and post but their posts will all be dead to everyone except them; naively, it is plausible to me that they actually cannot see that the posts are dead because they were DOA. In other words, even though the account is not shadow-banned, the domain might be. Anyway, hope that helps.

3 ms·

https://archive.ph/aoXIY https://archive.ph/aoXIY @dang didn't see this post before posting the archive.ph link at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4772234

by nickvec 6mo ago

lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 6mo ago
You should link to the actual source and include the archive link as the post text or as a top-level comment. The domain displayed next to the link will otherwise be the archive domain, which does not inform readers about the source. Also, @mentions are not implemented on HN; email hn@ycombinator.com to get mod attention. (And you can confirm with them what I wrote about archive links.)
- gnabgib 6mo ago
  The link goes to a dead post (because archive - but there's nothing to merge), you're posting to an account that has posted/failed with archive links before and used @ before.. not sure what you're hoping for here.
  - lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 6mo ago
    I am hoping to inform them? It does not appear their comments with attempted @mentions have informative replies, and posting a link to an archive domain will mean it's dead-on-arrival. Unless someone vouches and then comments on one of those posts, there isn't really an opportunity for a commenter to tell them. I suppose part of your point is that they should be able to see that the post is dead; that regardless does not tell them why the post is dead. I'm also not totally convinced they can see that the post is dead. When an account is shadow-banned on this forum they can still log in and post but their posts will all be dead to everyone except them; naively, it is plausible to me that they actually cannot see that the posts are dead because they were DOA. In other words, even though the account is not shadow-banned, the domain might be. Anyway, hope that helps.