If the tool fails for some reason, couldn't an overly eager agent attempt to fix what's blocking it by digging into the tool (e.g. attaching a debugger or readi

If the tool fails for some reason, couldn't an overly eager agent attempt to fix what's blocking it by digging into the tool (e.g. attaching a debugger or reading memory)? I think the distinction here is that skill+tool will have a weaker security posture since it will inherently run in the same namespaces as the agent where MCP could impose additional security boundaries.