3 ms·
And to the extent that those are two different things, your argument completely falls apart.
by IAmBroom 7mo ago
And to the extent that those are two different things, your argument completely falls apart.
- apparent 7mo agoNope, because even if bodice rippers are not pure porn, it's not clear why libraries should subsidize entertainment for patrons. I'm not saying it's a terrible use of taxpayer money, just disagreeing with OP who said it's "such a great use of tax money". It does not bring people together, educate them, or provide for the common defense. Why not have movie theaters be government-run? It would make as much sense as providing free smut-adjacent books for (almost entirely) women.