3 ms·
> testimony in a recent trial Court cases are the real way to audit security. Larping about security and complaining about companies responding to court order
by blitzar 6mo ago
> testimony in a recent trial
Court cases are the real way to audit security.
Larping about security and complaining about companies responding to court orders only gets you so far. Its way more useful to look at what actually happens in reality.
- tbrownaw 6mo agoThe recent Trivy / LiteLLM mess was also a security thing, and seems rather different.
- jMyles 6mo agoThe problem is that, in the current environment of dishonest and corrupt states, "what actually happens in reality" isn't the same as what happens in court because of parallel construction.
- tclancy 6mo agoI know it’s not germane to the Signal issue, but this caught my eye, “who previously pleaded guilty to providing material support to terrorists”. The case comes with a long statement about the Antifa “organization”. Just your weekly reminder we are living under an Orwellian administration. https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/antifa-cell-members-convicted-prairieland-ice-detention-center-shooting https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/antifa-cell-members-convicted...
- bronco21016 6mo agoYes and no. Court cases certainly will disclose what capabilities various parties have come up with when it comes to security. However, there are documented cases where the government chooses to abandon prosecution for the sole purpose of preventing disclosure of some of their cyber capabilities.
- SwtCyber 6mo agoTrue, court cases are one of the few times details actually surface