2 ms·
It would be illegal to post such rhetoric, and I can't name a single social network CEO who's been investigated and found guilty of posting such rhetoric. Perha
by cbeach 6mo ago
It would be illegal to post such rhetoric, and I can't name a single social network CEO who's been investigated and found guilty of posting such rhetoric. Perhaps I missed a court case somewhere?
- Planktonne 6mo agoThe intentional ellision of the difference between "happened" and "happened, and then a very specific legal process also happened" is disingenuous. If you have to resort to such tactics to make your arguments, consider rethinking your positions instead.
- pesus 6mo agoWait, you think it's illegal to post something racist online? That is absolutely not the case in the US, and I have no idea why you'd think it was. It's also pretty confusing why you think simple descriptors are "slurs". It only takes one quick google search to show that he helps promote white supremacist rhetoric: https://www.axios.com/2024/05/03/elon-musk-nick-fuentes-x-account https://www.axios.com/2024/05/03/elon-musk-nick-fuentes-x-ac... https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-67446800 https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-67446800 Don't worry, there's more.