3 ms·
You are pointing at something that is orthogonal to this paper. The LLM did not randomly recommend or bring this disease up to people - it merely assumed the di
by simianwords 7mo ago
You are pointing at something that is orthogonal to this paper. The LLM did not randomly recommend or bring this disease up to people - it merely assumed the disease was true when the preprint was pointed at it.
- simmerup 7mo agoThe LLM bought up the disease because some person put a fake journal in its training data. If the person put their product as th definitive cure for the made up disease, the LLM probably would have mentioned that too. > merely assumed the disease was true when the preprint was pointed at it. What do you mean by preprint pointed at it? It being the disease?
- simianwords 7mo ago> The LLM bought up the disease because some person put a fake journal in its training data. This is not true - the model was not trained on this fake disease. It brought it up because it found it during real time search. >What do you mean by preprint pointed at it? It being the disease? On this I'm wrong - it turned out that the model brought up this disease even when not mentioning it explicitly.
- simmerup 7mo agoInteresting, will be looking into RAG now. I assume Claude was retrained regularly but Opus for example was last trained August 2025. Way older than I thought it’d be