4 ms·
Your phone should not have any business whatsoever collecting, checking, or verifying the age of the person using it. > And as a parent, I know that if child p
by inetknght 6mo ago
Your phone should not have any business whatsoever collecting, checking, or verifying the age of the person using it.
> And as a parent, I know that if child protection is opt-in, there’ll be a huge fight about it, because some other parents won’t activate it, which then makes the situation unfair for the kids. I’d much rather have it on by default so that all kids are treated the same.
If you cared about your children, you would be against this. Otherwise you're fighting against your children's future; their privacy, their sanity, their ability to participate in a functioning democracy.
- pmlnr 6mo agoA phone, no. An internet connected device is another question. One can always get a dumbphone without this.
- tbossanova 6mo ago“But $parent, none of the other kids have it on! I’m missing out on everything! Are you trying to ruin my life? I hate you!” Rinse and repeat until you break
- Aurornis 6mo agoI’m a parent and I think all of these arguments are ridiculous. You shouldn’t need the force of government across the nation to set boundaries for your own kids. It’s also getting kind of silly to pretend that these laws are going to stop those other kids’ parents from simply age-verifying their phones for them. These fantasies where the government passes a law and suddenly every parent and child in the country settle into the exact same social norms are just that - fantasy.
- subscribed 6mo agoI'm a parent and this argument is silly to put it gently. "No" is a complete sentence after the reasoning has been laid out the first time. Yes, I did the same with tiktok, Instagram, WhatsApp in my house for my kids. Their home network is mildly sanitised, their phones minimally parented. It's mostly consensus despite their whining (mostly performative, it seems).