3 ms·
Legally finding plaintiffs, who can sue us for our illegal machinations is not allowed on our platform. What a world we live in. If this isn't the simplest demo
by siruwastaken 6mo ago
Legally finding plaintiffs, who can sue us for our illegal machinations is not allowed on our platform. What a world we live in. If this isn't the simplest demonstration of monopolization of social media that Facebook has, then I don't know what is.
- Traubenfuchs 6mo agoWould you allow it on yours? As a shareholder or on the board of directors of your company I would not be pleased. Nothing nefarious about that.
- jquery 6mo agoThere's a strong chance it's illegal so admitting to it is pretty breathtaking. They must be very confident they're in the clear, or the spokesperson didn't run this by the right people.
- feralsandwich 6mo agoWhat is illegal about it? What law does it break?
- JumpCrisscross 6mo agoCould these removals indicate editorial discretion that would remove § 230 protections from Facebook?
- feralsandwich 6mo agoI think that would apply if they started removing user content about this. But Facebook is simply declining to accept ads about this, which doesn't seem like it would apply here.
- hotstickyballs 6mo agoIt’s not illegal, just stupid because. Because plaintiffs can use this as evidence that they can police their own platforms
- polishTar 6mo agoThat’s an internet argument. The legal issue being debated in actual courts has never been “does Facebook have the technical capability to remove content”.