3 ms·
The article itself is informative... But the diagrams, the low contrast on the web page, the font sizes, even some of the writing sounds...umm... AI-driven I'm
by aanet 7mo ago
The article itself is informative... But the diagrams, the low contrast on the web page, the font sizes, even some of the writing sounds...umm... AI-driven
I'm not complaining about the use of (AI) tools per se, which is fine I guess.
Something feels off. Somewhere between a little-off to a bit-more-off.
Sorry. I'm trying to find the right words... Perhaps a bit too polished? (Can there be such a thing?)
- ori_b 7mo agoIt's slop.
- DiffTheEnder 7mo agoUnderstand the concern here - I can confirm the diagrams/interactive elements on desktop were AI generated based on a diagram I made in powerpoint. The interactivity and JS elements is not something I'm not going to code myself. I'm a writer/thinker not a frontend dev. The diagram is almost 1:1 the same except the cheese layout which it chose to do a bit differently. The mobile version of the diagram is an AI driven layout restructure - however still true to my source material. The writing of the article is entirely my own. I'll choose to take it as a compliment that you think it's too polished haha.