4 ms·

You clearly didn't read the article closely enough. The first header is "The Numbers Aren’t Working Out." If it was about the audience, they would have switched

You clearly didn't read the article closely enough. The first header is "The Numbers Aren’t Working Out." If it was about the audience, they would have switched stopped earlier.

traderj0e 6mo ago
[flagged]
- dominicq 6mo ago
  I agree with you. It's clear that they're leaving X because "X bad", but they don't want to say it that way. I don't know if X is or isn't bad, but it seems pretty mainstream and a good representation of a lot of society, both US and international, so for an org that apparently cares for the online rights of people, it feels silly to leave a platform where there are - people. (and this is coming from someone who doesn't use X or social media in general)
  - basisword 6mo ago
    It is a poor representation of society internationally. Twitter has never been a big platform outside the US (and Japan I believe). It's irrelevant most other places.
    - nailer 6mo ago
      It’s pretty relevant in the UK and globally in tech too.
- PunchyHamster 6mo ago
  [flagged]
  - traderj0e 6mo ago
    [flagged]
manwds 6mo ago
[dead]
inquirerGeneral 6mo ago
[dead]
lancewiggs 6mo ago
Those numbers are the real news here - that's a brutal drop in traffic. Are other organisations seeing the same?